top of page

Unveiling the Key Differences Between Face Verification and Identification in the World of Face Recognition

In the realm of Face Recognition Technologies, Verification and Identification stand as two fundamental pillars, each serving distinct purposes. Understanding these differences is not only vital for professionals in the field but also for those exploring its vast potential. Let's dive into these essential concepts and shed light on their disparities. 


Verification, also known as face authentication or one-to-one matching, is the process of confirming whether a person is who they claim to be. It entails a direct comparison of a presented face with a reference face template, often stored in a database, linked to the claimed identity. In simpler terms, verification is about ensuring that two given faces indeed belong to the same individual. This technology finds applications such as in granting access, unlocking smartphones, securing facilities, confirming identities in financial transactions, and more. 


In contrast, Identification, often referred to as recognition or one-to-many matching, involves searching for an unknown person's face within a large database of faces, without any prior information about their identity. This task demands more sophisticated techniques to sift through and locate matches from an extensive pool of known faces. Identification's use cases span law enforcement efforts, such as searching for suspects in a criminal database, locating missing individuals, enhancing airport security, streamlining attendance tracking systems, and various other applications. 

The differences in these fundamental tasks also extend to their evaluation and accuracy measurement. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) recognizes these distinctions and has established separate tracks for evaluation in their Face Recognition Vendor Test (FRVT). 

Accuracy Metrics: 

Before delving into evaluation, let us understand the key accuracy metrics: 

False Match Rate (FMR)

When the system assesses whether two faces match, the FMR quantifies how frequently the system inaccurately concludes that these two faces are a match, even when they belong to different individuals. In essence, FMR indicates the system's tendency to erroneously match the faces of different people as the same. 

False Non-Match Rate (FNMR)

This is the opposite of FMR. FNMR measures how frequently the system incorrectly indicates that two faces do not match, even when they belong to the same person. In simpler terms, FNMR shows how often the system mistakenly thinks that two faces from the same person are actually from different individuals. 

False Negative Identification Rate (FNIR)

FNIR measures how frequently the system fails to locate a person, even if that person is within the search dataset. In essence, it indicates how often the system overlooks or misses someone it should have found. 

False Positive Identification Rate (FPIR)

FPIR is similar to FMR, but it gauges how frequently the system inaccurately assigns someone's identity as a specific person when, in reality, they are not that individual. To put it simply, FPIR reveals how often the system guesses incorrectly about a person's identity. 

Returning to the NIST Evaluation Tracks, we have two separate categories: 

FRVT11: The Face Verification Track focuses on measuring the False Non-Match Rate (FNMR) across various datasets at preset False Match Rate (FMR) thresholds. In simpler terms, it is checking how often the system fails to recognize when two faces should match. It does this by measuring the rate at which the system wrongly identifies faces as a match when they shouldn't, using different sets of data and preset accuracy levels. 

FRVT1N: The Face Identification Track. Here, the evaluation centers on the False Negative Identification Rate (FNIR) at a fixed threshold of False Positive Identification Rate (FPIR). Basically, it focuses on evaluating how well the system finds people in a large database. It measures how often the system misses identifying someone it should have found (FNIR) while keeping the rate of wrongly identifying people in check (FPIR). This track tests the system's performance with various combinations of datasets. 

In closing, comprehending the nuances between Verification and Identification is paramount for the development and implementation of effective face recognition systems across various applications. At #FaceTagr, we specialize in analyzing requirements and crafting tailored solutions. Sometimes, this involves combining both Verification and Identification to provide comprehensive solutions that meet the evolving demands of our digital age. Embrace the possibilities, and together, let's shape the future of face recognition technology. 



bottom of page